State v. Craft
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
Ms. Craft appeals from her conviction, of child endangering, a violation of R. C. 2919.22(A)., Two issues are raised on appeal: (1) Whether R. C. 2919.22(A) is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, and (2) whether the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support a finding of guilt. We affirm the conviction.
'The first assignment of error questions the constitutionality of R. C. 2919.22(A). Before reaching the substance of this claim, we note that appellant did not bring this issue to the attention of the trial court by motion, objection or otherwise. The general rule is that an…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Rose v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- State v. SlagleOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. TichonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Brooks v. Hurst Buick-Pontiac-Olds-Gmc, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. ThrowerOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. BowmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.