Legal Opinion
Lampard v. Roth
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 23, 1984No. 11272-4-IPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Corbett, A.C.J.
Zane and Josephine Roth appeal the judgment against them in favor of Robert and Elizabeth Lampard. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
In October 1976, Roth purchased a retail market for investment purposes. Lampard undertook management of the store along with Ray Walberg. Roth and Lampard discussed acquisition of an ownership interest by Lampard as additional consideration for his management. Lampard brought this action seeking damages for breach of an oral contract to transfer an ownership interest in the store. After a lengthy bench trial, the judge found an enforceable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ridgeview Properties v. StarbuckWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Associated Mortgage Investors v. G. P. Kent Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Marion Davis v. Marathon Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Scott & Fetzer Co. v. DileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Barci v. Intalco Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Goodman v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Gammon v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Bernsen v. Big Bend Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Dempere v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.