Legal Opinion
Purdy v. Maree
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1939No. Civ. 12042PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend, plaintiff appeals.
The essential facts alleged in the complaint are:(1) On April 2, 1928, at Birmingham, Michigan, for the purpose of inducing the bank of which plaintiff is receiver to extend credit to Murphy, Kosborough and Maree, Inc., a corporation, defendant executed an agreement, which was substantially as follows:
Defendant, E. H. Murphy and A. J. Kosborough, in consideration of the extension of credit by the bank of which plaintiff is receiver to Murphy, Kosborough and Maree, Inc., jointly and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. CliftonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Broadway Bank & Trust Co. v. LongleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Maurer v. BernardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Corbyn v. BrokmeyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900
- Dixon v. BartlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Easton v. AshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- R.N.C., Inc. v. TsegeletosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Martindell v. BodreroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Wilson v. WaltersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Royal Alice Properties, LLC v. AMAG, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020