Legal Opinion

Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Clifton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1932PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The exclusion of the evidence, which forms the basis of a number of exceptions, may be upheld upon the ground that the complaint declares on the note as it is written, and not otherwise. There is no effort in the pleadings to enlarge the liability of any of the parties. S. v. Bank, 193 N. C., 524, 137 S. E., 593. Nor is there a plea in defense of nudum, pactum. Consideration is admitted or not denied. The defendants have been sued simply as makers and guarantors of a note, and this more than three years after its maturity. There is no evidence that said note was extended or renewed from time…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rouse v. Wooten.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Beebe v. KirkpatrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Welfare v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  4. Cowan v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. State Ex Rel. Greene County v. National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. CreasySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Gillespie v. DeWittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. CreasySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. EAC Credit Corporation v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Pavlantos v. GaroufalisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API