Wilson v. Walters
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DRAPEAU, J. pro tem.
In this action to renew a judgment, complaint was filed three months more than five years after the judgment was entered. Unless the five-year period of the statute of limitations was extended, the cause is barred under the provisions of section 336 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
During the five-year period, the defendant made a series of $25 payments on account, commencing September, 1937, and ending in March, 1939, amounting to a total payment of $450 on a judgment for $8,858.75. This fact, standing alone, would not toll the statute. (Purdy v. Maree, 31 Cal.App.2d 125…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McCormick v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Concannon v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Rodgers v. ByersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- State Loan & Trust Co. v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- In re FinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- North Star Development Corp. v. WolfswinkelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Blazier v. Western Pipe & Steel Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1946
- In re HallDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.