Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Bartlett
California Supreme Court
Decided November 26, 1917No. S. F. No. 7567PublishedCited by 5 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John J. Yan Nostrand, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment upon the judgment-roll alone.
The complaint alleges that the defendant, in the state of Nevada, executed to the plaintiffs as copartners, a note of the following tenor: “Round Mountain, Nevada, 12/9-’08. One day after date I promise, to pay Dixon & Stebbins, or order, $2806.00 (twenty-eight hundred and six dollars), for yalue received with interest at the rate of 1 per cent per month until paid. Henry J. Bartlett”; and that thereafter, on March 9, 1912, and on September 23, 1909, in San Francisco, California, “in a writing signed by said defendant, in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCormick v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maurer v. BernardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Purdy v. MareeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Fredericksen v. Knight Land Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
- Jones v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- Wahl v. McCaddonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926