Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Burke

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1911No. Docket No. 108PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Ingham; Collingwood, J. Case by William Johnson against William Burke for personal injuries. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an action on the case to recover damages for a personal injury received by the plaintiff while in the employ of the defendant. The plaintiff entered the employment of the defendant in September, 1909, and the injury occurred on April 2, 1910.

The defendant was engaged in constructing a high school building in the city of Lansing. At the time of the injury complained of, the structure was erected and inclosed, and it was being finished on the inside. The dimensions of the building were about 150 feet by 60 feet, and about 50 feet high. There was a basement with two floors above. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hunn v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Ashman v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Eastman v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Haywood v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Fluhrer v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Silverstone v. London Assurance Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. City of Detroit, Mich. v. BlanchfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
  3. Edwards v. MeinbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Wheeler v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Ovavez v. Patrons' Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API