Legal Opinion

Haywood v. Johnson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1879PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Haywood brought this action in .the county of St. Clair to recover against the defendants on their joint promissory note. It was commenced by declaration and the service was made on Johnson in that county and two days later on Wixson in Sanilac county. All the parties were residents of the state, but non-residents of St. Clair county.

Wixson claiming that the suit was not well brought in consequence of such non-residence and of the fact that service was made on him in another county, moved the court to set aside the proceedings, and the court set them aside so far as they related to him. - ■

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bishop v. VoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  2. Campau v. DeweyMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Smith v. WebsterMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Jewell v. LamoreauxMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  5. People ex rel. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance v. Judge of the Saginaw Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Louden Irrigating Canal Co. v. Handy Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  2. Konold v. Rio Grande Western Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Silverstone v. London Assurance Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. May v. BlackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  5. People v. CoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API