Legal Opinion

Inman v. Netteland

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 9, 1999No. 23158-1-IIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

— Sherry Inman appeals from a judgment entered following arbitration. Based upon the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Roberts v. Johnson, 137 Wn.2d 84, 969 P.2d 446 (1999), we agree that the 20-day period in which to request a trial de novo under MAR 7.1 1 does not commence until the arbitrator files proof of service of the award, pursuant to MAR 6.2. 2 Thus, we reverse.

FACTS

An arbitrator held in favor of Jim and Susan Netteland in this sexual discrimination lawsuit. On August 1, 1996, the arbitrator filed his award in Lewis County Superior Court but did not file an affidavit of proof of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Roberts v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Hoirup v. Empire Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  4. O'NEILL v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  5. Purser v. RahmWashington Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. ElwayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  2. Sunderland v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Wallace v. KuehnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Wallace v. KuehnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Will v. Frontier Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API