Sunderland v. Allstate Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.
— Allstate Indemnity Company appeals entry of a judgment affirming an arbitration award in favor of Earnestine and David Sunderland, arguing that: its proof of service of a request for a trial de novo satisfies MAR 7.1 (a); and, contrary to the trial court’s ruling, MAR 7.1 does not require a sworn attestation that service occurred. We agree and reverse.
FACTS
In July 1997, the Sunderlands sued Allstate, alleging *326breach of contract for Uninsured Motorist (UIM) benefits, bad faith, and violations of the Consumer Protection Act for Allstate’s failure to pay UIM benefits for injuries sustained in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Roberts v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Kim v. PhamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Kim v. PhamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Terry v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Manius v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Terry v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Manius v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Alvarez v. BanachWashington Supreme Court · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.