Legal Opinion
Allen v. Coe
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 5, 1943No. 8252PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S. C.A. § 63, to require the Commissioner of Patents to issue a patent to plaintiffs covering the process of using spent distillers’ grain mash in the production of yeast of a high vitamin content. Of the claims insisted on, claim six may be taken as typical. It is as follows:
“6. Method for producing high yields of yeast, high in baking strength and high in B Vitamin content, including the PP Factor, which consists in growing the yeast in a wort containing spent distillers’ grain mash from which the alcohol has been separated in an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Fleischman Yeast Co. v. Federal Yeast CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1925
- In Re EbertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- In re LangdonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Torok v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1954
- Application of Basil Vivian Aller, Richard Norman Lacey, Reginald Harold HallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co. v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1959
- Contour Saws, Inc. v. The L.S. Starrett CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Larsen Products Corp. v. Perfect Paint Products, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.