Legal Opinion

Fleischman Yeast Co. v. Federal Yeast Corporation

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 9, 1925PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOPER, • District Judge.

The Fleisehman Yeast Company filed its bill of complaint to enjoin the Federal Yeast Corporation against the infringement of patents No. 1,449,103 to Hayduek, and No. 1,419,127 to Nilsson and Harrison. The defendant’s answer put in issue the validity, and, if the claims be narrowly construed, the infringement, of the patents. The first patent, which for brevity will be called 103, was based on an application filed October 30, 1920, by Frederick Hayduek of Germany, assignor to the Fleisehman Company, and carries the effective date of invention of March 15, 1915, the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Application of Hans Hilmer, Gerhard Korger, Rudi Weyer and Walter AumullerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  2. Standard Brands, Inc. v. National Grain Yeast Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Maibohm v. RCA Victor Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  4. Standard Brands, Inc. v. National Grain Yeast Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  5. Federal Yeast Corporation v. Fleischmann Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API