Legal Opinion
Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co. v. Watson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 27, 1959No. Civ. A. 705-57PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
This is an action against the Commissioner of Patents, under 35 U.S.C. § 145, to secure an adjudication that the plaintiff is entitled to a patent on an application that has been rejected by the Patent Office.
The application in question is Serial Number 171,752, filed on July 1, 1950, by Albert C. Nuessle and Peter J. McKone, Jr., and assigned to the plaintiff, Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co. The alleged invention relates to the business of finishing textile fabrics. Specifically, it relates to the process to which fabrics, are subjected after they are manufactured, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Dean A. Lyon v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- L-O-F Glass Fibers Company and Everett J. Cook v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Clinical Products Limited v. BrennerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
- Agrashell, Inc. v. Hammons Products Company, Hammons Products Company v. Agrashell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Sun Chemical Corp. v. BrennerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
- White v. Mar-Bel, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1973