Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Hyde
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion. For the opinion of the District Court see 207 Fed. Rep. 956.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clarke
In this suit the complainants, the first named as the ■ owner and, the other as general licensee, claim an infringe ment of United States letters patent No. 835120, issued on the sixth day of November, 1906, to Henry Livingstone Sulman, Hugh Fitzalis Kirkpatrick-Picard and John Ballot. The usual injunction, accounting and damages are prayed for. The District Court sustained the patent as to claims numbered 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11 and 12; found that the defendant had infringed each of' these claims, and granted the prayer of the petition. .The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Mowry v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by176 opinions
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- In Re Jack R. Wands, Vincent R. Zurawski, Jr., and Hubert J.P. SchoemakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Sonix Technology Co., Ltd. v. Publications InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.