Legal Opinion

Application of Basil Vivian Aller, Richard Norman Lacey, Reginald Harold Hall

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 22, 1955No. Patent Appeal 6079PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of appellants’ application for a patent, Serial No. 45,326, filed August 20, 1948, for “Decomposition of Organic Peroxides.” Of the original sixteen claims, claims 11-14 have been withdrawn, and no claims have been allowed, all having been denied as unpatentable over a reference specifically acknowledged in the application as prior art, as hereinafter discussed.

The rejection was made upon an article appearing in the Journal of the German…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. In re SwensonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  3. In Re SolaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  4. Allen v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  5. In re IrmscherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bird Provision Co. v. Owens Country Sausage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Bird Provision Company v. Owens Country Sausage, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1974
  3. Dow Chemical Co. v. Halliburton Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1985
  4. Van Brode Milling Co. v. Cox Air Gauge System, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
  5. Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Gillette Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API