California-Calaveras Mining Co. v. Walls
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Metson, Drew & Mackenzie, John Hancock, and Horatio Ailing, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
The plaintiff corporation sued for a decree canceling a promissory note for one hundred thousand dollars delivered by it to defendant Wails; to have annulled a trust deed made by it to defendant Wilson, as trustee, to secure said note; to have-canneled-certain stock certificates issued by plaintiff and held by defendants Manson, Jarmuth, and McGuinn, and for an .accounting by Manson to plaintiff. Manson was served by publication and failing to appear his default was entered. The action was dismissed as to the defendant McGuinn. Jarmuth, Walls, and Wilson answered and contested the right of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Seymour v. Spring Forest Cemetery Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Western States Life Ins. Co. v. LockwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Apollo Capital Fund, LLC v. Roth Capital Partners, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- McCandless v. FurlaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.