Legal Opinion
Power v. Village of Hibbing
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 12, 1930No. Nos. 28,124, 28,125PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.
These are appeals by Dottie M. Power and Itasca Bazaar Company from orders denying their motions for new trials.
One action was brought by Dottie M. Power as the owner of the real estate, consisting of four lots and a business building thereon in the village of Hibbing, and the other by the Itasca Bazaar Company, the tenant of the building. In each case damages are sought to be recovered because of water and sewage backing up in the sewer in the alley in the rear of the premises and flowing back through the connecting pipes and entering and flooding the basement of the building.
The court at…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Losee v. . BuchananNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Cosulich v. Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Merrifield v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Uggla v. BrokawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Curtis v. DeweyIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Pettinger v. Village of WinnebagoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- H. Christiansen & Sons, Inc. v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Segal v. Bloom Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Shann v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.