Legal Opinion

Roche v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 21, 1947No. 34,243PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magnet, Justice.

Plaintiffs recovered a verdict of $850 against defendant, the city of Minneapolis, in an action in which they claimed that water seeping through the floor of their basement damaged their property, caused, as they asserted, by the negligence of the city. The court on motion set aside the verdict and ordered judgment for defendant. The appeal is from the judgment entered on the order.

In 1935, plaintiffs built a home on York avenue between Forty-first and' Forty-second streets in Minneapolis. It was damaged on May 29 and 30, 1942, by water seeping into the basement from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McClure v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. Pye v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Wallace v. HallowellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. Dudley v. Village of BuffaloSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martinez v. CookNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Pettinger v. Village of WinnebagoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Chabot v. City of Sauk RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Miles v. City of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Burford v. Village of La GrangeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API