Legal Opinion

Goumas v. K. Karras & Son

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 14, 1943PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, District Judge.

The claimant excepts to the libel on the ground that the facts averred are insufficient to constitute a cause of action, do not constitute a cause of action within maritime jurisdiction, and do not give rise to any maritime lien. Libelant is a ship chandler, and provides supplies and personnel to merchant vessels when employed so to do. He alleges that the master of the SS “Karras” requested him to supply fourteen seamen for service thereon, and at the time represented that the vessel was fit and seaworthy and the seamen’s living quarters fit and habitable. He further…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. New Bedford Dry Dock Co. v. PurdySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Union Fish Co. v. EricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Osaka Shosen Kaisha v. Pacific Export Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Minturn v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  5. Aktieselsikabet Fido v. Lloyd BrazilieroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bergen Shipping Co., Ltd. v. Japan Marine Serv., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  2. Peralta Shipping Corporation v. Smith & Johnson (Shipping) Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. P. D. Marchessini & Co., (NEW YORK) Inc. v. Pacific Marine Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  4. Miravalles Compania Naviera, S. S. v. Nissho Co., Ltd., TokyoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1962
  5. Brown v. Motor Vessel "Numero Uno"District Court, Virgin Islands · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API