Legal Opinion
Osaka Shosen Kaisha v. Pacific Export Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 2, 1923No. 129PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
March 19, 1917, through its agent at Tacoma, Wash., Osaka Shosen Kaisha, incorporated under the laws- of Japan and owner of the Japanese ^teamer “ Saigon Maru/’ then at- Singapore, chartered the whole of that vessel, including her deck, -to respondent Lumber Company to carry a full cargo of lumber from the Columbia or Willamette River to Bombay. In May, 1917, the vessel began to load at Portland, Ore. Having taken on a full under-deck cargo and 241,559 feet upon the deck, the captain refused to accept more. After insisting that the vessel was not loaded to capacity and ineffectively demanding…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Vandewater v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Schooner Freeman, &C. v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Union Fish Co. v. EricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Bulkley v. Naumkeag Steam Cotton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1860
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- ING Bank N v. v. M/V TEMARACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Plamals v. S. S. "Pinar Del Rio"Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Cactus Pipe & Supply Co. v. M/V MontmartreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Krauss Bros. Lumber v. Dimon Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.