Minturn v. Maynard
Supreme Court of the United States
This was an appeal from the district court of the United States for the northern district of California. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Grier
court.
The respondents were sued in admiralty, by process in personam. The libel charges that they are owners of the steamboat Gold Hunter ; that they had appointed the libellant their general agent or broker; and exhibits a bill, showing a balance of accounts due libellant for money paid, laid out, and expended for the use of respondents, in paying for supplies, repairs, and advertising of the steamboat, and numerous other charges, together with commissions on the disbursements, &c.
The court below very properly dismissed"the libel, for want of jurisdiction. There is nothing in the nature of a…
2Cited by68 opinions
- Shipping Financial Services Corporation v. William J. Drakos, Duke Petroleum Transport Corporation and Omi Petrolink CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Ingersoll Milling Machine Co. v. M/V BodenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Baltimore Line Handling Co. v. BrophyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- The Steamer EclipseSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.