Legal Opinion

Brown v. Motor Vessel "Numero Uno"

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided November 25, 1983No. Civil No. 83-28PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChristian, Chief Judge

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

David E. Cook has requested leave to intervene in this action for breach of contract and conversion arising out of the sale of a motor vessel. Cook’s proposed complaint alleges a commission or finder’s fee owed to him by defendant Woodfin under an oral contract whereby defendant allegedly agreed to compensate Cook if the latter found a vessel agreeable to Woodfin and Woodfin subsequently purchased that vessel.

The memorandum of law in support of the motion is naked ipse dixit: “Under Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, entitled ‘Interventing’ [sic] this request…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. John Dilks v. Aloha Airlines, Inc., and Air Line Pilots Association, International, Applicant for Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Doolittle v. KnobelochU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1889
  3. Goumas v. K. Karras & SonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  4. Goumas v. K. Karras & SonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosa v. Virgin Islands Water & Power AuthoritySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API