Legal Opinion
Aktieselsikabet Fido v. Lloyd Braziliero
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 19, 1922No. 289PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
These causes arise out of controversies between the libelants, as owners of seven Norwegian steel sailing vessels, and their charterers, together with certain coal companies im-pleaded by the charterers. The causes were heard together in the court below, and were disposed of in a single opinion. They were argued together in this court, and will be determined here in one opinion.
The libelants are corporations existing under the laws of the kingdom of Norway, and as owners of their respective ships entered into charter parties with the respondents; the libelants agreeing…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- The AdaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Crossman v. BurrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Columbian Insurance Company v. Ashby & StriblingSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Crossman v. BurrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- The HudsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1883
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- David Crystal, Inc. v. Cunard Steam-Ship CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Farwest Steel Corp. v. Barge Sea-Span 241Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Armour & Co. v. Fort Morgan Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Klein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.