Legal Opinion
Clark v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided December 8, 2005No. Docket 252765PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmolensk, J.
In this wrongful termination case, plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s order granting summary disposition for defendant. We affirm.
Plaintiff asserts that he was approached sometime in 2001 and asked to accept early retirement as part of a salaried work force reduction. When plaintiff declined to retire, he claims he was told that his position would likely be eliminated and that retirement was in his best interest. Plaintiff accepted early retirement and completed his last day of work on August 31, 2001.
Plaintiff filed this action on September 8, 2003, alleging that defendant had…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Terrien v. ZwitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Camelot Excavating Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
- DiPonio Construction Co. v. Rosati Masonry Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Liparoto Construction, Inc v. General Shale Brick, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Hamade v. Sunoco, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Dekarske v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- Able Demolition, Inc v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Vittiglio v. VittiglioMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.