Legal Opinion

Camelot Excavating Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1981No. 62978, (Calendar No. 14)PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blair Moody, Jr., J.

Plaintiff Camelot Excavating Company (hereafter Camelot) brought action against defendant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (hereafter St. Paul) to recover payment on a labor and materials bond. Camelot was a subcontractor of third-party defendant Priestly Contracting, Inc. (hereafter Priestly). Priestly was named as principal on the bond. Defendant St. Paul moved for accelerated judgment on the basis of a one-year period of limitations contained in the *124bond contract.1 Plaintiff Camelot brought a motion for summary judgment under GCR 1963, 117.2(3).2 Camelot’s…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Tom Thomas Organization, Inc. v. Reliance InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Turner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Bogart v. George K. Porter Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Daly v. RizzuttoWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Lesher v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. John L. Taylor v. Western And Southern Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Vidimos, Inc. v. Laser Lab Ltd., and Wysong Laser Co., Inc., and Wysong & Miles Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Morgan v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
  5. Connie Thurman John Thurman v. Daimlerchrysler, Inc., James Stanford Pittman, Jointly and SeverallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API