Able Demolition, Inc v. City of Pontiac
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.
Able Demolition, Inc., appeals the trial court’s grant of summary disposition to the city of Pontiac. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the trial court’s ruling.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On July 1, 2004, Able Demolition contracted with Pontiac to tear down certain abandoned homes. As the below-quoted provisions of the contract make clear, Able was required to obtain specific written permission to proceed before demolishing any building:
IV SCOPE OF SERVICES
4.01 The Contractor shall diligently perform certain Demolition Services for the City of Pontiac, primarily for the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Quality Products and Concepts Co. v. Nagel Precision, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
- UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Holland v. Trinity Health Care Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Harbor Park Market, Inc v. GrondaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Schubiner v. Zolman (In re Schubiner)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- Bolone v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- Newburgh/Six Mile Limited Partnership v. Adlajbs Films USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.