Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtT. Gr. Kavanagh, J.
Plaintiff, an insurance agent, contracted to place several advertisements in the Flint classified telephone directory. The defendant, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, accepted the order and agreed to publish the listings in its 1963 Yellow Pages — but failed to do so. Upon plaintiff’s suit for damages, the defendant Bell Telephone asserted the following clause of their contract as an affirmative defense:
“Telephone company (a) will not be bound by any verbal agreements or (b) will not be liable to advertiser for damages resulting from failure to include all or any of said items of advertising…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Jaquith v. HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
- Baird v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Wade v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- A & M PRODUCE CO. v. FMC Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- DeValk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Pokorny v. Quixtar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Cova v. Harley Davidson Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Wille v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.