Legal Opinion
Allen v. Rushing
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided February 19, 2004No. 06-03-00101-CVPublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice ROSS.
The trial court dismissed Anthony Allen’s malpractice lawsuit against attorney Steven L. Rushing for want of prosecution. On appeal Allen contends (1) that the trial court’s dismissal did not serve the ends of justice, (2) that the trial court failed to provide him with a fair hearing, (3) that his suit against Rushing has merit, and (4) that the trial court failed to follow proper procedure resulting in an improper dismissal. We affirm the judgment.
Historical and Procedural Background
This ease involves two separate incidents. The first incident occurred in 1999…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Villarreal v. San Antonio Truck & EquipmentTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- In the Interest of Z.L.T.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- Boyattia v. Hinojosa, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
- Dolenz v. Continental National Bank of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- $24,156.00 in U.S. Currency v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Johnson v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- In re BuggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- $24,156.00 in U.S. Currency v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- $24,156.00 in U.S. Currency v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.