Hamilton v. Pechacek
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUE WALKER, Justice.
I. Introduction
Appellant Jim H. Hamilton, Jr., an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pau-peris, challenges the trial court’s order dismissing his lawsuit against Appellee Emil J. Pechacek. In five points, Hamilton asserts that the trial court erred by dismissing his suit with prejudice under chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code without conducting a hearing on Pechacek’s motion to dismiss or on Hamilton’s motion for new trial. We will affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
II. Factual and ProCedural Background
Hamilton is an inmate housed…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Fernandez v. T.D.C.J., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
- Van Duzer v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- Allen "F" Calton v. Steve Schiller, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2016
- Carter v. Diamond URS Huntsville, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
- Luis Raul Camacho v. Matthew K. Rosales, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2014
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.