Legal Opinion

Pharmacists Mutual Insurance v. Cincinnati Insurance

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided October 2, 2009No. C.A. No. 7:08-3631-HMHPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HENRY M. HERLONG, JR., Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Company (“Pharmacists Mutual”) *747filed this action alleging that it is entitled to recover certain prejudgment and post-judgment interest from Defendant Cincinnati Insurance Company (“Cincinnati”). After consideration, the court grants Cincinnati’s motion for summary judgment and denies Pharmacists Mutual’s motion for summary judgment as moot.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

This case is related to a previous…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Beverly Roumph, Individually and as Next Friend of Lavina Roumph Lavina RoumphCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. PHARMACISTS MUT. INS. CO. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API