Pharmacists Mutual Insurance v. Cincinnati Insurance
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HENRY M. HERLONG, JR., Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Company (“Pharmacists Mutual”) *747filed this action alleging that it is entitled to recover certain prejudgment and post-judgment interest from Defendant Cincinnati Insurance Company (“Cincinnati”). After consideration, the court grants Cincinnati’s motion for summary judgment and denies Pharmacists Mutual’s motion for summary judgment as moot.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
This case is related to a previous…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Beverly Roumph, Individually and as Next Friend of Lavina Roumph Lavina RoumphCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- PHARMACISTS MUT. INS. CO. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2009