Legal Opinion

PHARMACISTS MUT. INS. CO. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided October 2, 2009No. C.A. No. 7:08-3631-HMHPublished

1Opinion of the Court

658 F.Supp.2d 745 (2009)

PHARMACISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff,

v.

CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

C.A. No. 7:08-3631-HMH.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Spartanburg Division.

October 2, 2009.

Adriane Malanos Belton, Esquire, James Dunbar Myrick, Esquire, Charleston, SC, for Plaintiff/Petitioner.

Mark Stevens Barrow, Esquire, William Roberts Calhoun, Jr., Esquire, Columbia, SC, for Defendant/Respondent.

OPINION AND ORDER

HENRY M. HERLONG, JR., Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Beverly Roumph, Individually and as Next Friend of Lavina Roumph Lavina RoumphCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API