Legal Opinion
Metis Development LLC v. Bohacek
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 28, 2011No. A129650PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEEDHAM, J.
Appellants Cortland Bohacek and Puja Bohacek, in her capacity as trustee of the 2000 Bohacek Family Trust, appeal from an order denying their petition to compel arbitration of claims alleged against them in a cross-complaint filed by respondents. They contend (1) the order must be *683reversed due to the court’s refusal to issue a statement of decision; (2) the court erred in finding that they waived their right to arbitrate; and (3) the court erred in denying their petition on the ground that there would be a possibility of conflicting rulings on common questions of law or fact.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Central Valley General Hospital v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carbajal v. CWPSC, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Acquire II, Ltd. v. Colton Real Estate GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Frog Creek Partners, LLC v. Vance Brown, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- ECC Capital Corp. v. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Lindemann v. HumeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.