Legal Opinion
Hoogenberg v. Simmons
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 2013No. D060557PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HALLER, Acting P. J.
Buford Keith Simmons (Keith) appeals from a judgment in which the court ordered him to pay substantial sanctions to his former wife, Tracy Hoogenberg, for his conduct during the litigation of Tracy’s dissolution petition. On appeal, Keith asserts the court erred by ordering sanctions against him under Family Code sections 2107, 271, and *5871101.1 He also contends the court erred by denying his request for need-based attorney fees from Tracy, and failing to grant a continuance and conducting the second day of trial in his absence.
In the published portion of this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fossum v. FossumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Walker v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Kington v. FongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Palmer v. HokansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Rossi v. RossiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sagonowsky v. KekoaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Estate of Trikha CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Marriage of Cashman CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Marriage of D'Souza CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Marriage of Lin CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.