Legal Opinion

No Oilport! v. Carter

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 9, 1981No. Civ. A. C80-360M, C80-369M and C80-553SPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BELLONI, District Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

This litigation consists of three consolidated cases in which plaintiffs seek to block construction of an oil pipeline which is proposed to originate in Port Angeles, Washington, and terminate in Clearbrook, Minnesota. Plaintiffs in Civil No. 80-360 are a number of environmental groups; they shall be collectively referred to as No Oil-port. Plaintiffs in Civil No. 80-369 are the City of Port Angeles, Washington, and Clallam County, Washington; they shall be collectively referred to as The City. Plaintiffs in Civil No. 80-553 are a number of Indian…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. Hammond v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  3. Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1982
  4. Daingerfield Island Protective Society v. LujanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
  5. Lumber, Production & Industrial Workers Log Scalers Local 2058 v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API