Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Norton

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 13, 2005No. CIV.A.01-2345(PLF)PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case, brought under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) and other federal environmental statutes, arises from decisions of the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) and other federal agencies facilitating the construction of a refined petroleum products pipeline from Bloomfield, New Mexico to Salt Lake City, Utah. Comprising 220 miles of natural gas pipeline proposed to be converted to petroleum products use and 260 miles of newly constructed pipeline, the pipeline traverses primarily private lands but also crosses the…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  2. Wilderness Workshop v. United States Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Oceana, Inc. v. EvansDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  5. The Ocean Conservancy v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API