Legal Opinion

Lumber, Production & Industrial Workers Log Scalers Local 2058 v. United States

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided January 6, 1984No. Civ. 82-719-PAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PANNER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, a lumber workers union and two of its officials, bring this action to enjoin certain federal officials from continuing to recognize a log scalers cooperative. They contend that union members have lost substantial job opportunities because the U.S. Forest Service recognized the cooperative in violation of the Forest Service Manual (“Manual”). The Forest Service recognized the cooperative even though it lacked a bylaws provision specifying approved methods for compensating employees. The union represents employees of a competing scaling organization…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Western Radio Services Company, Inc. v. Michael EspyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Western Radio Services Co. v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Hage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Hoskins Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Fairington Apartments v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API