Legal Opinion

Dircksen v. Greene County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2006No. 2005-0625PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} Appellants, Daniel and Debra Dircksen, are the owners of a 26.25-acre parcel of land in Sugarcreek Township, Greene County, which contains about five acres of cropland and about 21.25 acres of noncommercial timber. The Dircksens contend that their 26.25-acre parcel should be valued for taxation at its current agricultural-use valuation (“CAUV”). We disagree.

{¶ 2} The Dircksens own three contiguous parcels of land, which until tax year 2003 were valued for taxation on the basis of their CAUV. However, for tax year 2003, the Greene County Auditor revoked the CAUV status of all three…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HairstonOhio Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. HIN, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Maralgate, L.L.C. v. Greene County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Fife v. Greene County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API