Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 2010No. 2009-1816PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc., 127 Ohio St.3d 54,
2010-Ohio-4505.] HUDSON, SUPERINTENDENT, APPELLANT, v. PETROSURANCE, INC., APPELLEE, ET AL. [Cite as Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc., 127 Ohio St.3d 54,
2010-Ohio-4505.] No provision in the Insurers Supervision, Rehabilitation, and Liquidation Act, codified in R.C. Chapter 3903, authorizes payment of interest to any claimant. (No. 2009-1816 — Submitted May 26, 2010 — Decided September 29, 2010.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 08AP-1030,
2009-Ohio-4307. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT The Insurers…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Comer v. RiskoOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. LoweOhio Supreme Court · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hernandez v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- LVNV Funding, L.L.C. v. AltahtamoniOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Weidman v. HildebrandtOhio Supreme Court · 2024