Legal Opinion

State v. Hairston

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 2004No. 2002-1998PublishedCited by 160 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether R.C. 2941.401 places a duty of reasonable diligence on the state to discover the whereabouts of an incarcerated defendant against whom charges are pending.

{¶ 2} Around 1:00 a.m. on September 27, 2000, two men, one of them holding a gun, burst through the back door of Ann and Mike’s Bar, shouting at everyone to stay still. Richard Hairston, who had been seated at the bar, went behind the bar and into the kitchen.

{¶ 3} Meanwhile, the bartender opened the cash register and the two men grabbed money from there and from a tip jar and then…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sears v. WeimerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City of Middleburg Heights v. Ohio Board of Building StandardsOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by160 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Howard v. Miami Township Fire DivisionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Hulsmeyer v. Hospice of Southwest Ohio, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Wilson v. Lawrence (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Ohio Neighborhood Fin., Inc. v. Scott (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API