Fife v. Greene County Board of Revision
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Appellants, Greene County Auditor and Greene County Board of Revision (“the county”), appeal from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) in which the BTA reversed the board of revision and found that two parcels owned by the appellees, D. Mark Fife and Patricia Fife, qualified for current agricultural-use valuation (“CAUV”) pursuant to R.C. 5713.30 and 5713.31. The two parcels at issue comprise 18.7 acres. Of these, the owners devote approximately one acre to their house and grounds and about three acres to pasture for grazing cattle.
{¶ 2} About 14.2 acres at the site are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- American National Can Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Columbus City School District Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Renner v. Tuscarawas County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maralgate, L.L.C. v. Greene County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Fahncke v. FahnckeOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Chagrin River Hardwood Co. v. Ashtabula Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2017