DeStefano v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENCH, Judge:
Defendant appeals from a trial court’s order of summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiff in a declaratory action on an insurance policy. Two issues are raised on appeal. First, did issues of fact preclude entry of summary judgment? Second, did plaintiff “occupy” the insured vehicle at the time of the accident within the meaning of Oregon law? We affirm.
Defendant Oregon Mutual Insurance Company (Oregon Mutual), an Oregon cor poration, issued an automobile policy to Rod and Deanna Cooper, residents of Oregon, as named insureds. Three automobiles were covered under the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nafco Oil and Gas, Inc., a Corporation v. Nathan ApplemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Schlytter v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Amjacs Interwest, Inc. v. Design AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Lucky Seven Rodeo Corp. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
- MacKie v. Unigard Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. McKinneyKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- Village Inn Apartments v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Wycalis v. Guardian Title of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Genthner v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.