Legal Opinion
Meemic Insurance Company v. Louise M Fortson
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 29, 2018No. 337728PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtM. J. Kelly, J.
*471 Defendants/counterplaintiffs, Louise Fortson and Richard Fortson, individually and as conservator for their son, Justin Fortson, appeal as of right the trial court's order granting the motion of plaintiff/counterdefendant, Meemic Insurance Company, *157 for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) and denying the Fortsons' motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(I)(2). For the reasons stated in this opinion, we reverse.
I. BASIC FACTS
This case arises out of a motor-vehicle incident that occurred in September 2009. On that day, Richard and Louise's 19-year-old son, Justin, was riding on…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. New Hampshire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Titan Insurance Company v. HytenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- Barnard Manufacturing Co. v. Gates Performance Engineering, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Bahri v. IDS Property Casualty InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- McDonald v. Farm Bureau InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dalley v. Dykema Gossett PLLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Allen v. The Hanover Insurance GroupDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Allen v. The Hanover Insurance GroupDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Anthony Lacascio v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co of MiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
- Atain Insurance Company v. General MacHineryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.