Legal Opinion

Rambin v. Allstate Insurance Company

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 2014No. Docket 146256PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZahra, J.

In this case we are called on to examine the meaning of MCL 750.414, the misdemeanor joyriding statute, in the context of MCL 500.3113(a), which excludes certain individuals from entitlement to personal protection insurance benefits (commonly known as “PIP benefits”) under the no-fault act. Specifically, under MCL 500.3113(a), a person who was injured while “using a motor vehicle or motorcycle which he or she had taken unlawfully,” is not entitled to PIP benefits. We recently examined these statutory provisions in Spectrum Health Hosps v Farm Bureau Mut Ins Co of Mich.1 We held that a person…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. Kent Richland, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. Anton, Sowerby & Associates, Inc v. Mr. C's Lake Orion, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Monaco v. Home-Owners Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Anton Sowerby & Associates Inc v. Mr C's Lake Orion LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Beth Bracy v. Yolanda Yvette NicholsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API