Legal Opinion

Bates v. McTammany

California Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1938No. Sac. 5139; Sac. 5140PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiff and the defendant formed a copartnership for the purpose of conducting radio station KTRB in the city of Modesto. Subsequently the plaintiff commenced two actions against the defendant. In one he sought to establish a trust for the benefit of the partnership in the real property occupied by the radio station, title to which was held in the name of the defendant. In the other he prayed for an accounting, payment of accrued and overdue partnership debts out of accumulated partnership funds, and equal division of the surplus between the partners. In the first action the defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Karrick v. HannamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Freeman v. DonohoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Gerard v. GateauIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Josephthal v. GoldNew York Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zeibak v. NasserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Yoder v. HooperColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Heller v. Pillsbury Madison & SutroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API