Legal Opinion

Josephthal v. Gold

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for the dissolution of a partnership.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.

It is quite clear that the conduct of defendant was in technical opposition to the spirit of paragraph 8 of the articles of copartnership requiring an immediate and full entry in the books of *138the firm of the transaction of any business of or for the firm. . That the practice was condoned or approved in the earlier relations of two of the partners is not material, excepting in so far as it tends to establish a lack of positive or meditated abuse of his position by the offending partner in the beginning of the career of the new firm, and such infraction as occurred prior to March, 1917, might…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Skinner v. DaytonNew York Supreme Court · 1822
  2. Solomon v. KirkwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Gerard v. GateauIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Skolny v. RichterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. Henn v. WalshNew York Court of Chancery · 1833

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bates v. McTammanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API