Legal Opinion
Erickson v. Bastian
Utah Supreme Court
Decided May 4, 1940No. 6209PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOFFAT, Chief Justice.
An agreement for the sale and purchase of certain property was entered into on August 25,1938. Plaintiff brought this action claiming breach of the contract, demanding termination and repossession of the property.
Defendants take the position that there was no breach and that there had been a substantial performance. The court found in favor of the defendants and the plaintiff appeals.
This is a case in equity.
The agreement is not long and we set it out in its entirety:
“This agreement, made and entered into by and between Gertrude B. Erickson, of Loa, Utah, party of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Peterson v. ChaixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Hadley Dean Plate Glass Co. v. Highland Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Locomobile Co. of America v. BelascoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Glade v. Germania Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1881
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bastian v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Jones v. Acme Building Products, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1969
- Hulbert v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Hulbert v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1980