Legal Opinion

Jones v. Acme Building Products, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1969No. 11171PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant, Jones, initiated this declaratory judgment action for a judicial determination of the term “net worth” as used in a written agreement of the parties to this action.

Jones and defendant, Lee, each owned one half the stock in the defendant corporation, Acme Building Products. They had frequent disputes and had discussed the possibility of one or the other dis associating from the business.' Sometime in May of 1966, the parties met with their accountant, Branagan, and their attorney, Mecham. According to Branagan, the parties wanted to know if he had any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ephraim Theatre Company v. HawkUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Bennett v. Robinson's Medical Mart, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Plain City Irrigation Co. v. Hooper Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Milford State Bank v. West Field Canal & Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Erickson v. BastianUtah Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Associates v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  2. Holley v. Federal-American PartnersUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. Hydroswift Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Holley v. Federal-American PartnersUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Madsen v. PRUDENTIAL FED. SAV. & L. ASS'NUtah Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API