Legal Opinion
Hadley Dean Plate Glass Co. v. Highland Glass Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 19, 1906No. 2,210PublishedCited by 14 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judge.
The Highland Glass Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, engaged in manufacturing glass in that state, received and accepted the following order for the manufacture and delivery of glass from the Hadley-Dean Glass Company, a Missouri corporation, carrying on the business of a jobber and dealer in glass at St. Louis:
“Book us with 200,000 sq. ft. Ys ribbed more -or less' subject to sizes and delivery as required at price 5c. sq. ft. cut to size St. Louis delivery less 1% cash 10 days acet St. L. World’s Fair bldgs. Acc’t Mr. Torrence. Ack.”
*24323,056 square feet of glass…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation. Appeals of Robert A. HugginsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Seven Up Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Abbott Laboratories v. DurrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- W. J. Holliday & Co. v. Highland Iron & Steel Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Brown v. Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.