Legal Opinion

John v. Timm

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 17, 1922No. 23,035PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

This is an action for specific performance of an earnest money contract for the sale of land. The plaintiffs, husband and wife, were the sellers. Defendants, father and son, were the buyers. The court found for plaintiffs and defendants appeal. The contract was dated April 10, 1920. It recited that $1,500 earnest money had been paid. It provides for further payment of $4,500 March 1, 1921. Apparently a deed was contemplated at that time. Possession was to> be given to the purchaser March 1, 1921. The parties assume that the contract is within the mortgage registry tax statute, Gr. S. 1913, §…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Meyer v. BerlandiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  2. Campbell v. WilcoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Dana v. St. Paul Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  5. Mackey v. AmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Miller v. SnedekerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Ohio Citizens Trust Co. v. Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1944
  4. Kirk v. WelchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Podewitz v. GERING NATIONAL BANKNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API