Dana v. St. Paul Investment Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Brill, J., presiding, granting defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.
1Opinion of the CourtYanderburgh, J.
This is an action by the vendor to compel the specific performance of a contract for the sale of land. The contract is set out in the record, and among other provisions contains the following : “Time is made an essential condition of this agreement, in that if the said vendee shall fail to make payment of the balance of the above-named $1,350 at the time above specified after date of fur*195nishing abstract, or shall fail to perform any of the covenants herein-before specified by said company to be performed, then and in that case all moneys paid shall be forfeited as the consideration paid for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wilcoxson v. StittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Mackey v. AmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Canfield v. WestcottNew York Supreme Court · 1826
- Heisley v. SwanstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Manning v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1833
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Maffet v. Oregon & Cal. RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- Shouse v. DoaneSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
- Asia Investment Co. v. LevinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Schwab v. BaremoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.